Benzylparaben is a less commonly used paraben in personal care products. More research is needed to establish its safety due to the current lack of information.

Scientific Research

Caution: Please read's medical disclaimer.

Table of contents:

1. Sources

1.1 In personal care products

Benzylparaben is the ester of benzyl alcohol and p-hydroxybenzoic acid. It is much less commonly used in cosmetics than methylparaben, propylparaben, ethylparaben and butylparaben. Data submitted by industry to the US FDA in 2006 showed only 3 uses of benzylparaben, all in underarm deodorants, down from the 45 uses reported in 1984. Further, in 1984 most uses of benzylparaben were less than or equal to 0.1% (excepting one underarm deodorant in the 0.1-1% range), whereas an industry survey conducted later in 2003 was not able to find any reported uses or use concentrations of benzylparaben.[1]

More recently, tests on 170 personal care products bought in 2012 from the US revealed the presence of benzylparaben in 7% of rinse-off products, 11% of leave-on products and 15% of baby care products, at concentrations up to 8.18 μg/g (0.0008%).[2] An investigation that same year of 52 personal care products bought from Tianjin, China, did not find benzylparaben in any of the samples analyzed, confirming its infrequency of use relative to the other parabens.[3]

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel considered benzylparaben to be a safe cosmetic ingredient in its amended safety assessment on parabens published in 2008.[1] However, the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety reiterated in 2013 its view that the human risk of benzylparaben could not be evaluated due to the limited amount of information available.[4]

1.2 In food

Benzylparaben has been found in foodstuffs from the United States, though it was less frequently detected and present at lower concentrations compared to methylparaben, ethylparaben and propylparaben.[5]

1.3 In the environment

Benzylparaben has been detected in aquatic environments.[6][7][8][9] Its highest measured concentration is 4.4 ng/L in the Glatt River in Switzerland,[7] which is significantly lower than the highest concentrations observed for the other parabens. Benzylparaben is both photodegradable and biodegradable, limiting its persistence in water sources.[10]

Benzylparaben is also present in indoor dust, though it is not as abundant as methylparaben or propylparaben with a maximal measured concentration of 190 ng/g.[11][12][13]

An analysis of 253 paper products found benzylparaben in 25% of the products, at concentrations up to 281 ng/g. The highest concentrations were detected in sanitary wipes and currency bills.[14]

2. Exposure

Since benzylparaben is less commonly found in cosmetics, in food and in the environment, it stands to reason that exposure to benzylparaben should be lower than that of the other parabens. Indeed, benzylparaben was detected in the urine samples of only 39 out of 100 anonymous adults from the United States, compared to methylparaben (99%), propylparaben (96%), ethylparaben (58%) and butylparaben (69%).[15] These results were similar to those found in 60 Danish men, where benzylparaben was measurable in the urine from only 7% of the men, unlike methylparaben (98%), ethylparaben (80%), propylparaben (98%) and butylparaben (83%).[16] Likewise, a study in China on 109 Chinese young adults detected benzylparaben in only 19% of the urine samples, compared to methylparaben, propylparaben and ethylparaben which were detected in all samples, and butylparaben which was detected in 61% of the samples.[17]

The urinary and serum concentrations of benzylparaben are also consistently among the lowest of the parabens analyzed. The highest urinary concentrations measured were 0.13 μg/L in Chinese young adults,[17] 0.5 μg/L in a study in the US,[15] 0.8 μg/L in a study in Greece[18] and 2.06 μg/L in a study of Danish men.[16]

Measured serum concentrations of benzylparaben are even lower, with the highest observed concentration at just 0.29 μg/L.[16] Other studies which analyzed plasma samples for parabens were not able to detect benzylparaben at all.[15][19]

3. Topical bioavailability

It has been reported that the permeability coefficient varies as a function of chain length for the parabens using full-thickness human skin, such that those with shorter alkyl chains have higher permeability coefficients.[20] This suggests that benzylparaben penetrates the skin more poorly compared to methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben.

Benzylparaben is at least partly metabolized after penetrating the skin; one study demonstrated that when benzylparaben was applied to dermatomed human breast skin, 4% was still on the skin surface 24 hours later, 36% remained unmetabolized in the skin, 17% had penetrated through the skin as the native paraben, and 2% had been metabolized to p-hydroxybenzoic acid before crossing the skin.[21]

Benzylparaben and butylparaben appear to be the more selective substrates for the carboxylesterase-2 isoform in human skin.[21]

4. Safety

4.1 Skin irritation and sensitization

Parabens are among the least sensitizing commercial preservatives,[22] with most studies showing sensitization rates up to 3%.[23][24] This is true of patch test data from North America,[25][26][27][28][29] Europe[24][30][31] and the Asia-Pacific.[32][33] These patch tests usually utilize a mix of paraben esters however, and some did not include benzylparaben. We were only able to find 2 reports of contact allergy/dermatitis to benzylparaben alone.[34][35]

4.2 Potential endocrine disruptor

Benzylparaben has demonstrated estrogenic activity in a mouse uterine weight bioassay. When applied topically at 33 mg/mouse once daily for 3 days, estrogenic activity was reported, but not when applied daily at a 100 mg level. Moreover, like the other parabens the estrogenic potency was low compared to estradiol and there was no dose response. After comparing these results with those methylparaben from an earlier study, the authors concluded that the estrogenic activity of parabens increases with the addition of an aryl group.[36]

Benzylparaben was also estrogenic in an in vitro yeast bioassay, with an estrogenic activity that was 4000 times lower than estradiol.[37] In a competitive binding assay, its relative binding affinity for the estrogen receptor was ~30,000 times weaker than that of estradiol.[38]

Benzylparaben displayed several effects when tested on a human breast cancer cell line. It displaced estradiol from cytosolic estrogen receptors (ER) of human breast cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner, increased the expression of a estrogen responsive reporter gene in these cells, and was also able to increase the cells' proliferation. The growth effects were ER-mediated, as they were inhibited by a pure antiestrogen. In addition, benzylparaben was capable of increasing the growth of a second estrogen-dependent human breast cancer cell line but not an estrogen-insensitive cell line, providing further evidence of ER-mediation.[36]

A recent study observed that benzylparaben possessed inverse antagonist activity on human estrogen-related receptor γ (ERRγ), a known diagnostic biomarker and treatment target of breast cancer. Its 50% relative effective concentration was 134 μg/L.[39]

Unlike methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben however, benzylparaben was not detected in any extracts out of 20 human breast tumours.[40]

Scientific References

  1. Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol. (2008)
  2. Guo Y, Kannan K. A survey of phthalates and parabens in personal care products from the United States and its implications for human exposure. Environ Sci Technol. (2013)
  3. Guo Y, Wang L, Kannan K. Phthalates and parabens in personal care products from China: concentrations and human exposure. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. (2014)
  4. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. Opinion on parabens, 2013. SCCS. (2013)
  5. Liao C, Liu F, Kannan K. Occurrence of and dietary exposure to parabens in foodstuffs from the United States. Environ Sci Technol. (2013)
  6. González-Mariño I, Quintana JB, Rodríguez I, Cela R. Simultaneous determination of parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in water by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. (2009)
  7. Jonkers N, et. al. Mass flows of endocrine disruptors in the Glatt River during varying weather conditions. Environ Pollut. (2009)
  8. Yamamoto H, et. al. Aquatic toxicity and ecological risk assessment of seven parabens: Individual and additive approach. Sci Total Environment. (2011)
  9. Jonkers N, et. al. Occurrence and sources of selected phenolic endocrine disruptors in Ria de Aveiro, Portugal. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2010)
  10. Yamamoto H, et. al. Preliminary ecological risk assessment of butylparaben and benzylparaben -2. Fate and partitioning in aquatic environments. Environ Sci. (2007)
  11. Ramírez N, Marcé RM, Borrull F. Determination of parabens in house dust by pressurised hot water extraction followed by stir bar sorptive extraction and thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. (2011)
  12. Rudel RA, et. al. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust. Environ Sci Technol. (2003)
  13. Wang L, et. al. Occurrence and human exposure of p-hydroxybenzoic acid esters (parabens), bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), and their hydrolysis products in indoor dust from the United States and three East Asian countries. Environ Sci Technol. (2012)
  14. Liao C, Kannan K. Concentrations and composition profiles of parabens in currency bills and paper products including sanitary wipes. Sci Total Environment. (2014)
  15. Ye X, et. al. Parabens as urinary biomarkers of exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect. (2006)
  16. Frederiksen H, Jørgensen N, Andersson AM. Parabens in urine, serum and seminal plasma from healthy Danish men determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. (2011)
  17. Ma WL, et. al. Urinary concentrations of parabens in Chinese young adults: implications for human exposure. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. (2013)
  18. Asimakopoulos AG, Thomaidis NS, Kannan K. Widespread occurrence of bisphenol A diglycidyl ethers, p-hydroxybenzoic acid esters (parabens), benzophenone type-UV filters, triclosan, and triclocarban in human urine from Athens, Greece. Sci Total Environ. (2014)
  19. Sandanger TM, et. al. Plasma concentrations of parabens in postmenopausal women and self-reported use of personal care products: the NOWAC postgenome study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. (2011)
  20. Hansen J, Möllgaard B. Penetration and transformation of the parabens in human skin in vitro. Contact Dermatitis. (1990)
  21. Jewell C, et. al. Hydrolysis of a series of parabens by skin microsomes and cytosol from human and minipigs and in whole skin in short-term culture. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. (2007)
  22. Hafeez F, Maibach H. An overview of parabens and allergic contact dermatitis. Skin Therapy Lett. (2013)
  23. Menné T, Hjorth N. Routine patch testing with paraben esters. Contact Dermatitis. (1988)
  24. Menné T, et. al. Contact sensitization to 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/MI). A European multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. (1991)
  25. Storrs FJ, et. al. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America--1984 to 1985. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1989)
  26. Marks JG et. al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992 to 1994). Am J Contact Dermat. (1995)
  27. Marks JG et. al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1998)
  28. Marks JG Jr, et. al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol. (2000)
  29. Marks JG Jr, et. al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat. (2003)
  30. Schnuch A, et. al. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol. (1998)
  31. Wilkinson JD, et. al. Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis. (2002)
  32. Chow ET, et. al. Frequency of positive patch test reactions to preservatives: The Australian experience. Australas J Dermatol. (2013)
  33. Cheng S, et. al. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in Singapore: frequency of sensitization to 11 common preservatives 2006-2011. Dermatitis. (2014)
  34. Tosti A, Fanti PA, Pileri S. Dermal contact dermatitis from benzylparaben. Contact Dermatitis. (1989)
  35. Würbach G, Schubert H, Phillipp I. Contact allergy to benzyl alcohol and benzyl paraben. Contact Dermatitis. (1993)
  36. Darbre PD, et. al. Oestrogenic activity of benzylparaben. J Appl Toxicol. (2003)
  37. Miller D, et. al. Estrogenic activity of phenolic additives determined by an in vitro yeast bioassay. Environ Health Perspect. (2001)
  38. Blair RM, et. al. The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. Toxicol Sci. (2000)
  39. Zhang Z, et. al. Inverse antagonist activities of parabens on human oestrogen-related receptor γ (ERRγ): in vitro and in silico studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. (2013)
  40. Darbre PD, et. al. Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol. (2004)